Aeronautic Engineers

 
Home | Aircraft engineering | other topics | Rotorcraft engineering
  Position:HOME>Aerodynamic engineering>Article Content
wing airflow - a different "view" via CFD
Source:Internet Author:Unknow Pubdate:2008-04-03  
amorrison (Mechanical) 8 Jul 03 17:31
Consider the "visuals" of the following:

1/ "Standard" wind tunnel wing "view" c/w streamlines. - At low AoA the air is leaving the trailing edge at an angle of -say- 15 degrees below HORIZONTAL  

2/ A helicopter rotor "disk" rotating in the horizontal plane. - At low blade AoA the airflow is moving "only" VERTICALLY STRAIGHT DOWN

So why the difference?

In 1/ the air is moving over the stationary WING

In 2/ the wing is "cutting" through the stationary AIR

Why in "all" textbooks is option 1/ chosen? Maybe this was the "standard" and "only" option before CFD visuals.

Why not use CFD to promote the visuals of option 2 which in my opinion is the more "truthful" option since in the end lift is the reaction force to air being "forced" vertically downward by the "wing" shape. 字串1



SparWeb (Aerospace) 9 Jul 03 15:06
Either model will give you the same information.  Since wind tunnels were the way to get data in the golden days, it definitely follows that 1/ was the option of choice.  Air leaving the trailing edge of any wing is imparted a vertical velocity, whether the wing is moving and the air is stationary, or vice-versa.  The angle of downwash is a bit more meaningful in the wind tunnel as:

e = arctan(downwash velocity/wind velocity)

When you consider the air to be still, and the aircraft to be moving, the equation loses meaning unless you re-name the wind velocity to be "flight velocity".  Many textbooks do this interchangeably without much thought.  Since CFD is still being corroborated with wind tunnel tests these days, new textbooks will probably continue coming out using the wind-tunnel view. STF

字串2



amorrison (Mechanical) 28 Sep 03 21:36
Some descriptive "DOWNFLOW" here by Boeing experts

http://www.amasci.com/wing/straub.txt

BUT still not a single diagram (CFD or other) showing DOWNFLOW posted in response yet (three months).


(Click:

Previous:Size of air intake - dynamic losses   Next:Plotting 3D grafhic
[Add TO Favorites] [TOP] [PRINT] [CLOCE WINDOWS]  
  Hot Article
·fenders vs. no fenders
·vortex lattice method - drag
·What is optimum number of prop
·Human Powered Plane Spar Probl
·Aspect ratio of multi-element
·Supercavitation
·How do I get into Aerodynamics
·desiging aerodynamic bike part
·Need Textbook for Stoke's 2nd
·GROUND EFFECT
·solution options in flotran
·aeroacoustic for begginers
  Related Articles
·Plotting 3D grafhic
·Size of air intake - dynamic l
·Air flow/pressure gradiant on
·Duct losses
·Application of Surface analysi
·? on ANHEDRAL, DIHEDRAL, &
·Race Car End Plate-cutout vs f
·Discussion: Spoilers as Latera
·Popellers CFM
·Helicopter Aerodynamics
·flat plate parallel to flow in
·Gust loads on a rotorcraft
Power by DedeCms