Aeronautic Engineers

 
Home | Aircraft engineering | other topics | Rotorcraft engineering
  Position:HOME>Aerodynamic engineering>Article Content
unsteady mass flow calculation
Source:Internet Author:Unknow Pubdate:2008-04-20  
gio1 (Automotive) 30 Mar 08 18:34
Hello

I am having a hard time with the following problem:

Two vessels full of air at different pressures are connected through an orifice with a tap.

I need to size the orifice so that when the tap is open the pressures equalise after a given time t.

The flow is choked to start with and only after a while the mass flow rate starts to decrease. Any idea on how I could proceed?

Thanks

Gio1
 

rb1957 (Aerospace) 31 Mar 08 8:13
so you know the flow is initially chiked and later it stops being choked.  you know the conditions required for choked flow, so when these are no longer achieved you know the flow is not choked.  the mass flow rate dictates the change in pressure, and the time taken to achieve equilibrium.  so what's the question ?
字串2


can you create a connection between the tanks that isn't choked ? (cause this is much simpler to solve) then change the geometry to achive the time you require ??

gio1 (Automotive) 31 Mar 08 14:35

For the sake of simplicity I have assumed uncompressible flow when the choking disappears:

Mass_flow_rate=(Section_Area)x(density)xSQUARE_ROOT((2x(Pressure_drop)/(density))  

This calcs is done iteratively with a spreadsheet: at each time step I calculate the mass flow rate, which I then subtract from the mass of gas in the higher pressure vessel and add to the other. This allows to calculate the updated pressures from which I calculate the mass flow rate and so forth.

The problem is that the mass flow rate seems to drop linearly with time and this doesn't look right to me: I would expect an exponential decay with a flattening as the pressures are close to equalising...
字串6



rb1957 (Aerospace) 31 Mar 08 15:42
agree with you, that doesn't seem intuitive ... but then often aero. problems aren't !

you've got the initial conditions, p1, p2, mdot.  each time slice some mass flows from one to the other, redcuing p1, increasing p2 (depending on their respectives volumes), changing mdot ... seems reasonably straight-forward !?


(Click:

Previous:Simple foil design for large boat centerboard ?   Next:winglet design
[Add TO Favorites] [TOP] [PRINT] [CLOCE WINDOWS]  
  Hot Article
·fenders vs. no fenders
·vortex lattice method - drag
·What is optimum number of prop
·Human Powered Plane Spar Probl
·Aspect ratio of multi-element
·Supercavitation
·How do I get into Aerodynamics
·desiging aerodynamic bike part
·Need Textbook for Stoke's 2nd
·GROUND EFFECT
·solution options in flotran
·aeroacoustic for begginers
  Related Articles
·Simple foil design for large b
·winglet design
·weissinger 7-point theory
·Help on how to reduce drag
·Twin or Single Round Throttle
·air flow past a flat plate at
·Help on dihedral effect on low
·Shock Waves on Supercritical A
·Help on lift and drag coeff ca
·Hypersonic interference drag a
·How high will a bullet travel?
·Viscous Heating Problem (reali
Power by DedeCms